56 ईस्वी में [प्रेरित] पौलुस ने लिखा था कि 500 से अधिक लोगों ने पुनर्जीवित यीशु को देखा था और उनमें से अधिकांश अभी भी जीवित थे (1 कुरिन्थियों 15:6)। यह बात विश्वसनीयता की सीमा से परे है कि शुरुआती ईसाई ऐसी कहानीगढ़ सकते थे और फिर उन लोगों के बीच इसका प्रचार कर सकते थे जो यीशु के शरीर को पेश करके इसे आसानी से गलत साबित कर सकते थे।
In 56 A.D. [the apostle] Paul wrote that over 500 people had seen the risen Jesus and that most of them were still alive (1 Corinthians 15:6ff.). It passes the bounds of credibility that the early Christians could have manufactured such a tale and then preached it among those who might easily have refuted it simply by producing the body of Jesus.
In 56 A.D. [the apostle] Paul wrote that over 500 people had seen the risen Jesus and that most of them were still alive (1 Corinthians 15:6ff.). It passes the bounds of credibility that the early Christians could have manufactured such a tale and then preached it among those who might easily have refuted it simply by producing the body of Jesus.
न्यू testament (नया नियम) की पुस्तकों के परिणामी पाठ को संशय की दृष्टि से देखना प्राचीन काल के पूरे साहित्य को अंधकार में धकेलने जैसा है, क्योंकि प्राचीन काल का कोई भी अन्य दस्तावेज़ ग्रंथ सूची के लिहाज से न्यू टेस्टामेंट जितना अच्छी तरह प्रमाणित नहीं है।
To be skeptical of the resultant text of the New Testament books is to allow all of classical antiquity to slip into obscurity, for no documents of the ancient period are as well attested bibliographically as the New Testament.
To be skeptical of the resultant text of the New Testament books is to allow all of classical antiquity to slip into obscurity, for no documents of the ancient period are as well attested bibliographically as the New Testament.
किसी धर्म के लिए व्यावहारिक तर्कों के साथ कठिनाई यह है कि सच हमेशा "काम नहीं करते", और जो विश्वास "काम करते" हैं वे हर बार बिल्कुल सच नहीं होते।
The difficulty with pragmatic arguments for a religion is that truths do not always "work", and beliefs that "work" are by no means always true.
The difficulty with pragmatic arguments for a religion is that truths do not always "work", and beliefs that "work" are by no means always true.